THE IMPACT

Impact 2018-03-06T16:08:57+00:00

THE IMPACT OF PI TRAINING

The impact of Personal Initiative (PI) Training is manifold. First, it changes the mindset of entrepreneurs, which enables them to identify new opportunities, act on them quickly, develop better ideas on how to influence their environment, get more feedback and persist in the pursuit of their new ideas. Second, by implementing an effective entrepreneurship training in developing and emerging countries all over the world, we support the growth of local businesses, and thereby contribute to poverty reduction. Third, we help policy makers and practitioners alike to develop better educational programs for entrepreneurs. Our trainings are based on scientific evidence, and our research meets the highest scientific quality standards by utilizing randomized control trials (RCT). RCTs are the only approach that allows to draw causal conclusions and to better understand the conditions and mechanisms by which entrepreneurship trainings affect business success.

PI Training has been implemented in the context of several internationally funded research projects in Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean. PI Training is evaluated using multiple measurement waves. In Togo, for example, its impact was assessed over a period of more than two years. Below, you find some facts and figures from the team’s research in Uganda and Togo (see Glaub et al., 2014; Campos et al., 2017).

Impact_01_1
In Togo, training participants increased their level of profits by
0
% within two years after PI Training.
Profit growth in Togo was
0
times higher than after attending a traditional business training.
In Uganda, entrepreneurs who attended PI Training increased their level of sales by
0
% within one year.
Participants in Uganda increased their number of employees by
0
% within one year after PI Training.

WHAT PARTICIPANTS SAY ABOUT PERSONAL INITIATIVE TRAINING

“The Personal Initiative Training
opened my eyes, enabling me to grow my
business in new and exciting ways.”
“My wife is so much more passionate about running her
own business now. PI Training is like adding fuel to the fire.”
(a participant`s husband)
“The training has
changed my life more
than my business.”
“This training is very helpful for me.
The business was dying and it has been reactivated
because of this training.”
“Just make it available for all
business persons, it would make a
difference on people first, then on society.”
“I have to say that I am very satisfied with the training and very grateful for giving me the opportunity to participate at no cost to me. Thank you! I have learnt a lot and the way it has been presented to entrepreneurs in Jamaica is great.”
“This course is essential to aspiring entrepreneurs. It saves those us who do not have the resources to get a bachelor`s degree from four continuous years of spending on courses we cannot afford. Turn it into a school!”

PERSONAL INITIATIVE TRAINING IN THE MEDIA

DOCUMENTED RESEARCH

Further selected publications on aspects of Personal Initiative:

  • Frese, M. (2009). Towards a psychology of entrepreneurship: An action theory perspective. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5, 435–494.
  • Frese, M., Krauss, S., Keith, N., Escher, S., Grabarkiewicz, R., Luneng, S. T., et al. (2007). Business Owners’ Action Planning and Its Relationship to Business Success in Three African Countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1481-1498.
  • Gielnik, M. M., Frese, M., Graf, J. M., & Kampschulte, A. (2012). Creativity in the opportunity identification process and the moderating effect of diverse information. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 127–142.
  • Gielnik, M. M., Barabas, S., Frese, M., Namatovu-Dawa, R., Scholz, F. A., Metzger, J. R., et al. (2014). A temporal analysis of how entrepreneurial goal intentions, positive fantasies, and action planning affect starting a new venture and when the effects wear off. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 755-772.
  • Gielnik, M. M., Krämer, A.-C., Kappel, B., & Frese, M. (2014). Antecedents of business opportunity identification and innovation: Investigating the interplay of information processing and information acquisition. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63, 344-381.
  • Gielnik, M. M., Frese, M., Kahara-Kawuki, A., Katono, I. W., Kyejjusa, S., Munene, J., et al. (2015). Action and action-regulation in entrepreneurship: Evaluating a student training for promoting entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14, 69–94.
  • Gielnik, M. M., Frese, M., Bischoff, K. M., Muhangi, G., & Omoo, F. (2016). Positive impact of entrepreneurship training on entrepreneurial behavior in a vocational training setting. Africa Journal of Management, 2, 330-348.
  • Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2000). Cultural differences in planning – success relationships: A comparison of small enterprises in Ireland, West Germany , and East Germany. Journal of Small Business Management, 38(4), 28-41.
  • Rooks, G., Sserwanga, A., & Frese, M. (2016). Unpacking the personal initiative – performance relationship: A multi-group analysis of innovation by Ugandan rural and urban entrepreneurs. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 65, 99-131.
  • Unger, J. M., Keith, N., Hilling, C., Gielnik, M. M., & Frese, M. (2009). Deliberate practice among South African small business owners: Relationships with education, cognitive ability, knowledge, and success. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 21-44.